Korea Is Writing Its Own GENIUS Act — for the Won. Here's Who Benefits

This article is for informational purposes only and is not financial advice. TheGatBull may earn a commission from some links at no cost to you — see our disclosure and full disclaimer.

One year after the United States institutionalized dollar stablecoins with the GENIUS Act, Korea is building a version for its own currency. Here is the one line a US reader needs: if the American law was a law to export the dollar, Korea’s is a law to defend the won — same idea, opposite purpose. Phase 2 of Korea’s Digital Asset Basic Act would license won-stablecoin issuance, and 2026 is shaping up to be the legislative year. But until the Bank of Korea and the Financial Services Commission settle their fight over who gets to issue, which Korean stock is the real winner is not yet decided. This is not financial advice.

All ₩/$ conversions at USD/KRW ≈ 1,515 (July 7, 2026 close), unless dated otherwise.

The short answer: this is a legislation trade, not an earnings trade

Nobody in Korea has issued a single won stablecoin yet. There is no revenue, no launched product, no “Korean Circle” to buy. What there is instead is a bill whose final wording will decide whether banks or fintechs get to print the thing — and a cluster of theme stocks that jump and dump on every headline about that wording. So the honest framing is this: right now, buying into Korea’s stablecoin theme is betting on a line of legislative text, not on a business. Here is the US map, the part you only see from Seoul, and the player list under each outcome.

🎩 Under the Gat — Start with the part that trips up US readers: in America, the stablecoin trade has one clean ticker — Circle (NYSE: CRCL), whose stock basically is a stablecoin business. In Korea there is no such ticker, and under the scenario the central bank prefers, there may never be one — the issuer could be a bank consortium, not a company you can buy. What it means for investors: don’t go looking for “the Korean Circle.” Go looking for who ends up holding the license.

The US map you already know: the GENIUS Act at one year, a $311B world

Since the GENIUS Act was enacted on July 18, 2025, dollar stablecoins are fully inside the system. The deadline for implementing rules is July 18, 2026 — exactly one year later, and next week — by which six agencies (the OCC, FDIC, NCUA, Treasury, FinCEN, and OFAC) must finalize their frameworks. The law itself takes effect on the earlier of January 18, 2027 or 120 days after final rules, so if the agencies hit the deadline it could go live as early as mid-November 2026.

The market is roughly $311 billion (about ₩471 trillion) as of early July 2026, per DefiLlama. Tether’s USDT is about $184B (~59%) and Circle’s USDC is $73.1B (July 5) — together about 83% of the entire market. Banks now have a path to issue and custody directly. And for a US investor, the one “pure stablecoin ticker” to actually buy is Circle (NYSE: CRCL). For most US lists, that is where it ends.

The part you only see from Seoul: same law, opposite purpose

The essence of the GENIUS Act is a software update for dollar hegemony. The more the world uses USDT and USDC, the more demand there is for US Treasuries, and the stronger the dollar. So what are the countries that aren’t the dollar doing?

Korea runs one of the most active retail crypto markets on earth, and the worry has grown that the more dollar stablecoins get used, the more won capital drains onto dollar rails. So Korea’s legislation is not “let’s export our currency” — it is “let’s build a won version before our currency gets hollowed out.” Same stablecoin law, opposite direction. US media rarely frames it this way.

If you remember the kimchi premium — the recurring gap where crypto trades richer on Korean exchanges than abroad — the context clicks. That premium exists because the won is a “trapped currency” hemmed in by capital controls. A won stablecoin is Korea’s first institutional answer to that 30-year-old structural problem. When the dollar giant arrives at the gate, Korea’s choice is neither to bolt the door nor throw it open — it is to build a new gate out of its own money.

Where the law stands — and the fight holding it up

Phase 1 of the Digital Asset Basic Act (market order and disclosure) was filed by Rep. Min Byoung-dug in June 2025. The hard part is Phase 2 — the rules for issuing a won stablecoin. Disagreement over who gets to issue has pushed the government’s bill back about six months, and it has already blown past its early-2026 submission target. In early July 2026 the FSC signaled it would accelerate a framework law centered on the won stablecoin. Under the working plan, the minimum issuer capital is set at the e-money-issuer level of ₩5 billion (about $3.3M).

The deadlock is between two regulators:

Bank of Korea: issuers should be consortiums in which banks hold a majority (50%+1 share) — the logic being monetary sovereignty and financial stability.
Financial Services Commission: a majority requirement would chill participation by tech firms and stifle innovation; it prefers open licensing that lets fintechs in.

Under the bank-majority scenario, the benefit concentrates in bank holding companies and fintechs get pushed to “partner, not shareholder.” Under the open scenario, platforms like Kakao Pay and Naver Pay could become direct issuers. The FSC’s own current position is that the issuing consortium is “not finalized” — which is to say, nothing is decided.

The player map: who benefits under which outcome

The bank-consortium camp. Commercial banks are quietly preparing a joint-issuance consortium, and Woori and NH are reported to have received collaboration proposals from Kakao.
The Kakao camp. Kakao Bank (KRX: 323410) has said it will “lead issuance and distribution, with M&A if needed.” For Kakao Pay (KRX: 377300), NH Investment & Securities raised its target price from ₩38,000 to ₩130,000 (+242%), (about $25 to $86 per share) on the basis of an assumed 2030 won-stablecoin market of ₩35 trillion (about $23B) and a 50% Kakao share — explicitly an assumption, not a forecast to bank on.
The Hana–Dunamu–Naver axis. Hana Bank is buying a 6.55% stake in Dunamu (2.284 million shares) for about ₩1.003 trillion (~$660M) from Kakao Investment, becoming Dunamu’s fourth-largest shareholder. A Naver Financial–Dunamu merger is in progress. Combine the FX network, the Upbit exchange, and Naver Pay, and this is the largest single-ecosystem candidate.
Payment-infrastructure theme stocks. Danal (KRX: 064260), Galaxia Money Tree (KRX: 094480, a Korbit partner), Hecto Financial, Atton, Kona I, and others form a high-beta cluster that spikes and dumps on every legislative headline. Reconfirm each on the Korea Exchange before acting.

The GENIUS Act vs. the Digital Asset Basic Act, side by side

	US GENIUS Act	Korea Digital Asset Basic Act (Phase 2)
Status	Enacted 2025-07-18; implementing-rule deadline 2026-07-18	Phase 1 filed 2025-06; Phase 2 bill delayed ~6 months
Target currency	USD — export the dollar	KRW — defend the won
Who can issue	Banks plus licensed non-banks	Contested: BOK “bank-majority (50%+1)” vs. FSC “open”
Reserves	100% reserves, audited	100% reserves plus ₩5B (~$3.3M) minimum capital
Listed proxy	Circle (NYSE: CRCL)	None yet — only candidates

Not a perfect parallel — the US law institutionalizes an existing $311B market, while Korea’s law designs a market that does not exist yet. Use the comparison to orient, not to equate.

🎩 Under the Gat — Miss the “export vs. defend” difference and none of Korea’s behavior makes sense — not why the central bank is willing to die on the “banks must hold the majority” hill, and not why a small-cap payment stock can hit its daily price limit (limit-up, capped at +30% in Korea) and then crash on a single line of a draft bill. For an investor the takeaway is one sentence: this theme moves on legislative wording, so track the bill, not the ticker.

The skeptic’s checklist

What if the bill slips again? It already has — by about six months. What is confirmed is not that the disagreement is resolved, only that there is “will to accelerate.”
What if it ends up bank-majority? A big chunk of the fintech theme-stock rally could reverse, while bank holding companies become the quiet winners. You have to price both scenarios.
Is the ₩35 trillion (~$23B) forecast credible? It is a brokerage assumption. A target price built by multiplying a 2030 number for a market that has not launched by a 50% share is narrative, not valuation.
The old theme-rally question: who is left holding the bag? Ask it before you buy, not after.

🎩 Under the Gat — The real signal is not the surging theme stocks — it is what the banks are doing. Hana Bank’s ₩1.003 trillion ($660M) Dunamu stake, and the quiet consortium race among commercial banks, mean the smart money is already placed on the “who gets to issue” game. Your job as a retail investor is not to chase the pops; it is to draw the map of structural winners under each scenario. A view, not advice.

Sources

US Treasury / OCC (Bulletin 2026-3) / Chapman GENIUS Act tracker — enacted July 18, 2025; implementing-rule deadline July 18, 2026 across six agencies; effective earliest ~mid-November 2026.
DefiLlama (early July 2026) — total stablecoin market ~$311B; USDT ~$184B (~59%), USDC $73.1B (July 5); combined ~83%.
National Assembly bill system; FSC briefings (2026); Seoul Economic Daily, Etoday, Blockmedia — Phase 1 filed June 2025 (Rep. Min Byoung-dug); Phase 2 delayed ~6 months; ₩5B minimum issuer capital.
korea.kr FSC briefing; e-Focus — Bank of Korea “bank-majority (50%+1)” vs. FSC “open licensing”; consortium not finalized.
NH Investment & Securities via Money Today (June 25, 2025) — Kakao Pay target ₩38,000 → ₩130,000 (+242%), assuming a 2030 won-stablecoin market of ₩35T and a 50% Kakao share.
Blockmedia, Money Today, Newspim — Hana Bank to buy 6.55% of Dunamu (2.284M shares) for ~₩1.003T from Kakao Investment; Naver Financial–Dunamu merger in progress.
Newstomato, Hankook Ilbo, MBC, Newspim, FN News — Democratic Party August 2026 leadership race (Kim Min-seok ~35%, Chung Chung-rae ~20%, Song Young-gil); H2 2026 National Policy Committee stacked with digital-asset TF members.

(₩ converted at roughly ₩1,515 per US dollar, July 7, 2026. Small- and mid-cap tickers and figures should be re-checked on the Korea Exchange as of your trade date.)

Frequently Asked Questions

When will a won stablecoin actually launch?

A law has to pass first. Industry consensus points to 2026-2027 as the starting year, but the government’s bill has already slipped about six months and missed its early-2026 submission target. The near-term variable to watch is the Democratic Party’s August 2026 leadership election. Because the won stablecoin and the Digital Asset Basic Act are a presidential campaign pledge and a national-agenda item under the Lee Jae-myung government, how closely the party leadership hugs the administration will set the legislative pace. It is a three-way race: former Prime Minister Kim Min-seok (polling front-runner, ~35%), former party leader Chung Chung-rae (~20%), and Rep. Song Young-gil. Kim ran the very government that has been pushing this bill, so his win would tighten party-government alignment and likely speed passage. None of the three has publicly opposed the bill, and no candidate’s specific stablecoin stance is clearly on the record. The real cause of delay is not party politics — it is the Bank of Korea vs. FSC fight over who gets to issue. This is not financial advice.

How would a US investor get exposure?

Kakao Bank (KRX: 323410) and Kakao Pay (KRX: 377300) trade as ordinary shares on the Korea Exchange, not as US ADRs. For the access route see our guide on how to buy Korean stocks from the US, for the Kakao setup see our Naver vs. Kakao piece, and for market structure see our EWY concentration piece. A comparison, not a recommendation.

Is there a Korean Circle?

Not yet. Under the bank-majority scenario, the “Korean Circle” would not be a single company at all — it would be a bank consortium. That is the single biggest structural difference from the US, where Circle (NYSE: CRCL) is the one clean listed proxy.

Would this fix the kimchi premium?

Not directly. The idea that on-chain won liquidity could reduce the friction behind the premium is an untested hypothesis, not a mechanism you can trade today.